From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 21:43:01 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] diff: add -I that ignores matching changes Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin writes: > the use of `xcalloc()`, and now that I think further about it, an > `xmalloc()` should be plenty enough: `regcomp()` does not need that struct > to be initialized to all zero. Yup, I think it makes sense.