From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 21:52:27 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] run-command: allow capturing of collated output Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20250925125352.1728840-7-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> Adrian Ratiu writes: > From: Emily Shaffer > > Some callers, for example server-side hooks which wish to relay hook > output to clients across a transport, want to capture what would > normally print to stderr and do something else with it. Allow that via a > callback. > > By calling the callback regardless of whether there's output available, > we allow clients to send e.g. a keepalive if necessary. > > Because we expose a strbuf, not a fd or FILE*, there's no need to create > a temporary pipe or similar - we can just skip the print to stderr and > instead hand it to the caller. > > Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer > Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > Signed-off-by: Adrian Ratiu > --- > builtin/fetch.c | 2 +- > builtin/submodule--helper.c | 2 +- > hook.c | 2 +- > run-command.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > run-command.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- > submodule.c | 2 +- > t/helper/test-run-command.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > t/t0061-run-command.sh | 7 +++++++ > 8 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c > index 24645c4653..53bd5552c4 100644 > --- a/builtin/fetch.c > +++ b/builtin/fetch.c > @@ -2129,7 +2129,7 @@ static int fetch_multiple(struct string_list *list, int max_children, > > if (max_children != 1 && list->nr != 1) { > struct parallel_fetch_state state = { argv.v, list, 0, 0, config }; > - const struct run_process_parallel_opts opts = { > + struct run_process_parallel_opts opts = { > .tr2_category = "fetch", > .tr2_label = "parallel/fetch", This ... > diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c > index 07a1935cbe..76cae9f015 100644 > --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c > +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c > @@ -2700,7 +2700,7 @@ static int update_submodules(struct update_data *update_data) > { > int i, ret = 0; > struct submodule_update_clone suc = SUBMODULE_UPDATE_CLONE_INIT; > - const struct run_process_parallel_opts opts = { > + struct run_process_parallel_opts opts = { > .tr2_category = "submodule", > .tr2_label = "parallel/update", ... and this ... > > diff --git a/hook.c b/hook.c > index 54568d5bc0..199c210b97 100644 > --- a/hook.c > +++ b/hook.c > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int run_hooks_opt(struct repository *r, const char *hook_name, > }; > const char *const hook_path = find_hook(r, hook_name); > int ret = 0; > - const struct run_process_parallel_opts opts = { > + struct run_process_parallel_opts opts = { > .tr2_category = "hook", > .tr2_label = hook_name, ... and this are curious changes that are not explained in the proposed log message. > @@ -1841,6 +1852,10 @@ void run_processes_parallel(const struct run_process_parallel_opts *opts) > "max:%"PRIuMAX, > (uintmax_t)opts->processes); > > + /* ungroup and reading sideband are mutualy exclusive, so disable ungroup */ > + If (opts->ungroup && opts->consume_sideband) > + opts->ungroup = 0; Make it a BUG(""), which may help avoid unintended bugs, especially ... > diff --git a/run-command.h b/run-command.h > index 4679987c8e..ad0bab14b0 100644 > --- a/run-command.h > +++ b/run-command.h > @@ -436,6 +436,20 @@ typedef int (*feed_pipe_fn)(int child_in, > void *pp_cb, > void *pp_task_cb); > > +/** > + * If this callback is provided, instead of collating process output to stderr, > + * they will be collated into a new pipe. consume_sideband_fn will be called > + * repeatedly. When output is available on that pipe, it will be contained in > + * 'output'. But it will be called with an empty 'output' too, to allow for > + * keepalives or similar operations if necessary. > + * > + * pp_cb is the callback cookie as passed into run_processes_parallel. > + * > + * Since this callback is provided with the collated output, no task cookie is > + * provided. > + */ > +typedef void (*consume_sideband_fn)(struct strbuf *output, void *pp_cb); > + > /** > * This callback is called on every child process that finished processing. > * > @@ -495,6 +509,12 @@ struct run_process_parallel_opts > */ > feed_pipe_fn feed_pipe; > > + /* > + * consume_sideband: see consume_sideband_fn() above. This can be NULL > + * to omit any special handling. > + */ > + consume_sideband_fn consume_sideband; ... because which one between this and ungroup gets precedence. Document that they are mutually exclusive, and help the callers with a BUG("") message when both are set. > @@ -529,7 +549,7 @@ struct run_process_parallel_opts > * emitting their own output, including dealing with any race > * conditions due to writing in parallel to stdout and stderr. > */ > -void run_processes_parallel(const struct run_process_parallel_opts *opts); > +void run_processes_parallel(struct run_process_parallel_opts *opts); This is the same unexplained curiousity I touched earlier. Thanks.