From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:47:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] travis-ci: enable sequential test execution for t9113 and 9126
Message-ID: <xmqqoa7w78g8.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160523213254.GA11731@dcvr.yhbt.net>

Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> writes:
>> >> On 19 May 2016, at 19:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> >> Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> writes:
>> >> 
>> >>> Anyways, how about making the tests run on separate ports and
>> >>> not worry about serializing them at all?
>> >> 
>> >> Yeah, that does sound like a more sensible approach.
>> >
>> > Makes sense. However, it's not something I will tackle soon.
>> > Would you be willing to pick up $gmane/295048 (the first patch) as is 
>> > and drop $gmane/295050 (the patch discussed here)? Then the majority
>> > of Git SVN tests would run on Travis CI.
>> 
>> I am not sure if adding git-svn alone would be a good change.
>> Wouldn't it invite false failures from running these conflicting
>> tests at the same time?
>
> The problematic tests won't run unless *_PORT variables are set;
> which AFAIK they aren't, yet.

Ahh, OK that is perfect.

Thanks!