From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:30:47 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] strbuf: remove unnecessary NUL assignment in xstrdup_tolower() Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180216184529.GA22189@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: >> (although the calloc() case is slightly different from mallocz()), >> see: https://public-inbox.org/git/871shum182.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ > > Hmm. I do think xmallocz is a bit more explicit instruction of "please > NUL-terminate this for me" than xcalloc is. So I don't think it's > inconsistent to say this one is OK, but the trailing-NULL one that you > linked is not. Yeah, I too thought "slightly different" was an understatement of the week ;-).