From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:02:37 GMT
Subject: Re: errno oversight
Message-ID: <xmqqo85q2a42.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <211208.86o85rl07m.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

>>>                    if (refs_read_raw_ref(refs, refname, oid, &sb_refname,
>>>                                       &read_flags, failure_errno)) {
>>>                         *flags |= read_flags;
>>>                         if (errno)
>>>                                 *failure_errno = errno;
> ...
> Urg, sorry. Yes obviously that should use the failure_errno from
> refs_read_raw_ref().

Yeah, I was wondering about the same thing, "refs_read_raw_ref()
takes the failure_errno pointer for stuffing errno there, doesn't
it?  does the caller need to do anything?".

> I'll submit a fix for this soon. There's some good post-cleanup to be
> done here, it seems only one upstream caller of
> refs_resolve_ref_unsafe() cares about the failure_errno currently (but I
> didn't look into your reftable code).

Thanks.