From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 21:25:28 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] reftable/writer: improve error when passed an invalid block size
Message-ID: <xmqqo79d2wc7.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <5e7cbb7b193c578f7c946a5077a79421b0ac57f2.1715336798.git.ps@pks.im>

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> The reftable format only supports block sizes up to 16MB. When the
> writer is being passed a value bigger than that it simply calls
> abort(3P), which isn't all that helpful due to the lack of a proper
> error message.
>
> Improve this by calling `BUG()` instead.

As a "git" person, I do not mind this at all.

But doesn't the reftable/ library codebase want to avoid things like
BUG() that are very much tied to our codebase, for the same reason
as it avoids things like xmalloc(), xcalloc(), and ALLOC_GROW()?

We may have crossed the bridge long time ago, though.  We see a
handful calls to BUG() already inside reftable/ directory.