From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 16:22:57 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] reftable: ensure tables in a stack use sequential update indices
Message-ID: <xmqqo6qyh57i.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <aNTdTu08kKugIr7j@pks.im>

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

>> Wouldn't 'monotonically increasing' suggest that
>> prev_table.max_update_index can be equal to cur_table.min_update_index?
>> I have locally changed it to 'ascending order' for similar reasons.
>
> I guess the correct phrase here is "strictly monotonically increasing".

Both of you are right and I was wrong.  Thanks for a clarification.