From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:11:16 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: change the markup of paragraphs following a nested list item Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <2239952.irdbgypaU6@cayenne> Jean-Noël AVILA writes: > On Friday, 3 October 2025 05:41:34 CEST Jeff King wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 11:11:14PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: >> ... >> I think to appease both systems we need to put the inner bulleted list >> inside a block. I think that is OK in this case because there is no >> inner block marker to worry about. So: >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc >> b/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc index 49a7598ca5..aaea8c107f 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc >> +++ b/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc >> @@ -55,8 +55,9 @@ For historical reasons, this extension is respected > regardless of >> the refStorage::: >> Specify the ref storage format to use. The acceptable values are: >> + >> +-- >> include::../ref-storage-format.adoc[] >> - >> +-- >> + >> Note that this setting should only be set by linkgit:git-init[1] or >> linkgit:git-clone[1]. Trying to change it after initialization will not >> >> on top of your patch seems to do the right thing (no change in asciidoc, >> and eliminating the regression from your patch). It's a little gross >> because we are reaching across the include to realize that >> ref-storage-format.adoc contains a list that needs to go into its own >> block. I wonder if asciidoc implicitly opens a new block for an include >> but asciidoctor doesn't. But at any rate, this is the only way I could >> come up with for both to render correctly. > > Thank you for cross-checking. This is indeed almost impossible to mechanize > such testing at the moment. Thanks, both. So we'd see an update to this (I think this is already in 'next')?