From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 22:48:34 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2025, #04; Fri, 14)
Message-ID: <xmqqo6p0gtrx.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <a407a793-9636-42ea-afe8-1283b1e220b7@gmail.com>

Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:

> On 15/11/2025 16:51, D. Ben Knoble wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 5:27 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> * ps/history (2025-10-27) 12 commits
>>>   - builtin/history: implement "split" subcommand
>>>   - cache-tree: allow writing in-memory index as tree
>>>   - add-patch: add support for in-memory index patching
>>>   - add-patch: remove dependency on "add-interactive" subsystem
>>>   - add-patch: split out `struct interactive_options`
>>>   - add-patch: split out header from "add-interactive.h"
>>>   - builtin/history: implement "reword" subcommand
>>>   - builtin: add new "history" command
>>>   - replay: stop using `the_repository`
>>>   - replay: extract logic to pick commits
>>>   - wt-status: provide function to expose status for trees
>>>   - Merge branch 'sa/replay-atomic-ref-updates' into ps/history
>>>   (this branch uses sa/replay-atomic-ref-updates.)
>>>
>>>   "git history" history rewriting UI.
>>>
>>>   Comments?
>>>   source: <20251027-b4-pks-history-builtin-v6-0-407dd3f57ad3@pks.im>
>> 
>> But otherwise I generally am in favor of the idea and find it useful.
>
> I agree with this and I'm pleased it is reusing some of the internals of 
> "git replay" now. I've just reviewed the first half, I'll try and do the 
> rest sometime this week.

Thanks!