From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:43:47 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Verify index file before we opportunistically update it Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano writes: > Yeah, I was hoping that the real write codepath (as opposed to "this > is read only and we read the index without holding a lock---now we > noticed that the index needs refreshing, and we know how the > resulting refreshed index should look like, perhaps we can write it > to save cycles for other processes" codepath where we cannot and > should not take a lock early) would take the lock and then read, but > because that is not the way they work, the need the same protection, > I would think. Having said that, nobody sane would be running two simultaneous operations that are clearly write-oriented competing with each other against the same index file. So in that sense that can be done as a less urgent follow-up for this topic.