From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 21:59:51 GMT Subject: Re: Mark remote `gc --auto` error messages Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160602214834.GB13356@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > So the greater question is not "should this output be marked" but > "should auto-gc data go over the sideband so that all clients see it > (and any server-side stderr does not)". And I think the answer is > probably yes. And that fixes the "remote: " thing as a side effect. Thanks for stating this a lot more clearly than I could, and I agree that sending this to the other side regardless of the protocol is the right thing. I somehow doubt that server operators would check Apache logs to decide when to do a proper GC, so I do not consider it a true loss ;-)