From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 01:42:40 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] fetch --prune performance problem
Message-ID: <xmqqms9nfjvz.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <20250702005837.2813893-2-phil.hord@gmail.com>

Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com> writes:

> This version (V3) has three changes from V2:
>  - Removes a header declaration I forgot to move previously
>  - Cleans up the refs_warn_dangling_symrefs API to be more sane
>  - Drops the ref shortening that seems ill-advised in retrospect
>
> Phil Hord (2):
>   refs: remove old refs_warn_dangling_symref
>   clean up interface for refs_warn_dangling_symrefs

Hmph.  On top of which commit did you base these two patches?
The second one does not apply on top of applying 1/2 on top of
either v2.48.1 (where I queued the last round), v2.50.0 (the obvious
choice for a new development), or 'master'.

$ git am -s <patch-2-of-2.txt
error: patch failed: builtin/fetch.c:1384
error: builtin/fetch.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: builtin/remote.c:1521
error: builtin/remote.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: refs.c:458
error: refs.c: patch does not apply

Thanks.