From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 15:50:55 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] whitespace: symbolic links usually lack LF at the end Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Patrick Steinhardt writes: > I'd suggest that we only disable this check in case either: > > - One side doesn't exist, the other is a symbolic link. > > - Both sides are a symbolic link. Hmm. That is indeed a thoguht. But we do not want to complain in text-to-symlink transition that postimage lacks the terminating LF, so the above rules may be a good start but will need further tweaking, I am afraid. > Another question is whether we support symref targets that end in a > newline. I guess the answer is going to be some form of "yes", and in > that case we could of course loose some information. But honestly, this > is so much of an edge case that I don't really worry about it too much. Do we track, apply and diff any symrefs? I thought that we do not touch anything inside .git/ and symrefs live inside .git/refs/ (except for .git/HEAD)?