From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 21:13:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/22] sequencer: remember do_recursive_merge()'s return value
Message-ID: <xmqqlgzf8ej7.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <99fd1126-53d1-36e4-facd-7e18ba06e3c0@gmail.com>

Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> W dniu 29.08.2016 o 10:06, Johannes Schindelin pisze:
>
>> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
>> index 5ec956f..0614b90 100644
>> --- a/sequencer.c
>> +++ b/sequencer.c
>> @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int do_pick_commit(enum todo_command command, struct commit *commit,
>>  	const char *base_label, *next_label;
>>  	struct commit_message msg = { NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL };
>>  	struct strbuf msgbuf = STRBUF_INIT;
>> -	int res, unborn = 0, allow;
>> +	int res = 0, unborn = 0, allow;
>
> Not that I am against this part of change, making initialization
> explicit, but why we are initializing automatic variables with 0,
> which would be the default value anyway?

Because an on-stack "auto" begins its life with an undefined value,
unlike a file-scope static (and global variables) that can be in BSS
segment.

> I thought our coding
> guidelines discourage initializing with 0 or NULL...

You are confused between the two, I am afraid.