From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:34:17 GMT Subject: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2017, #06; Fri, 29) Message-ID: Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. You can find the changes described here in the integration branches of the repositories listed at http://git-blame.blogspot.com/p/git-public-repositories.html -------------------------------------------------- [Graduated to "master"] * hn/typofix (2017-09-22) 1 commit (merged to 'next' on 2017-09-25 at 489ad60f5b) + submodule.h: typofix * ic/fix-filter-branch-to-handle-tag-without-tagger (2017-09-22) 4 commits (merged to 'next' on 2017-09-25 at c7550033df) + filter-branch: use hash-object instead of mktag + filter-branch: stash away ref map in a branch + filter-branch: preserve and restore $GIT_AUTHOR_* and $GIT_COMMITTER_* + filter-branch: reset $GIT_* before cleaning up "git filter-branch" cannot reproduce a history with a tag without the tagger field, which only ancient versions of Git allowed to be created. This has been corrected. * ik/userdiff-html-h-element-fix (2017-09-24) 1 commit (merged to 'next' on 2017-09-25 at e3cbe89672) + userdiff: fix HTML hunk header regexp The built-in pattern to detect the "function header" for HTML did not match

..

elements without any attributes, which has been fixed. * jc/merge-x-theirs-docfix (2017-09-25) 1 commit (merged to 'next' on 2017-09-26 at 5a7d954982) + merge-strategies: avoid implying that "-s theirs" exists The documentation for '-X