From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:06:51 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] t5411: start using the default branch name "main" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Do you mean that this patch, squashed into 1/4: > ... > would be much more understandable? Yes, that was what I meant. We could have a "test_skip='under construction'" without any PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH in 1/4 and then replace that with the endgame state you already had in 4/4, alternatively, which might already be enough explanation for a short transition period that lasts just few patches ;-). > If so, I agree, and I will gladly send off the next iteration with that > change. > > If I misunderstood, can I please ask you to give it another try to explain > it to me? No, you understood what I meant perfectly. Thanks.