From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 16:28:36 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] doc: use only hyphens as word separators in placeholders Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0b404448-cd4b-8614-2c49-c4683b56879f@gmail.com> Jean-Noël Avila writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Jean-Noël AVILA writes: >> >>> The choices here may be awkward; no problem to propose even more descriptive >>> names. >>> >>>> Similarly "the 'format:' format" feels highly >>>> redundant, I expect the reader knows that contains a format >>>> inside it as it's mentioned immediately before *and* after. >>>> >>> The fact that it is a string doesn't tell you much about what you can do with >>> it. For me, this isn't a problem that the explanation is redundant. >> I agree that --format: is quite poor, as type alone does not >> give readers any information on what it means and how it is supposed >> to look like. Calling it does make quite a lot of >> sense. >> >> It is a bit less obvious how much value we get out of , >> though. In --opt= scheme of things, what comes after '=' are >> all s, so does not clarify over like the >> way clarifies over . >> > Agreed. Should reroll the patch series? I guess another (hopefully the final) reroll would not hurt (but we are not in hurry---this may be among the topics that graduate early in the next cycle, but not during this cycle). Thanks.