From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:50:50 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] connect: use "-l user" instead of "user@" on ssh command line Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8f470378-07a9-525b-ff8b-f0de011019cb@web.de> Torsten Bögershausen writes: > On 2016-05-03 10.50, Mike Hommey wrote: >> While it is not strictly necessary, it makes the connect code simpler >> when there is user. >> > > That commit message does't tell too much, I think. "Doesn't tell too much" is not necessarily bad, but "tells too little" is, and I think this tells me enough to say it is not a good change ;-) > Besides that, I'm sure it will break (at least) my ssh wrapper scripts, > which rely on user@host to be passed into the script. Thanks for bringing it up. "By reducing the language we accept it makes my coding simpler" is not a good excuse to break existing users, and "While it is not strictly necessary, " is a good hint that the author _knows_ that the change can either (1) be done without, or (2) be done in a way that does not break existing users and yet make the end result easier to read.