From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 20:12:41 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/reftable: document how to handle windows Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > The first two parts of the file name (${min}-${max}) already provide > visibility into what is going on, and the file system timestamp > already indicates which file is newer. I picked a random name as > suffix, as it gets the job done and is simple. OK, as long as two paths of the same ${min}-${max} part would not confuse people, I am perfectly fine. > Or, we could rename to ${min}-${max}-0 and if that fails try > ${min}-${max}-1, and if that fails ${min}-${max}-2 etc. I think that > is somewhat nicer than parsing back a counter from the existing > filenames, but it could have the effect that 1-1-0 could be newer than > 1-1-2. I agree that such an approach that can get fooled by an existing gap would not achieve anything over the ${random} approach. Thanks.