From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 23:31:50 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Documentation: add platform support policy Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20240802221948.2367124-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> Emily Shaffer writes: > - Wording and bulleting format fixes in commit message and body > > - Clarify cadence for tests against 'next' > > - Attempt to clarify dependency version minimum requirement to something > reasonable and flexible. Note: This section still probably needs > better wording; I took a crack at it but it still feels awkward. > Suggestions welcome, please. > > - Be more realistic about finding non-intrusive platform support > approaches ("we'll look for" rather than "we'll definitely find and in > fact know a few options in advance") > > - Move up "Minimum Requirements" section to the top, so we don't > bait-and-switch maintainers of platforms who don't even meet the > baseline but start making effort to set up testing infrastructure and > so on. > > I believe that this version addresses Randall's concerns with the > "minimum requirements" policy. Are there any other outstanding concerns > with the policy itself, as written, or is this ready to go in (modulo > nits)? I won't be able to speak for Randall, but I didn't see anything questionable in the changes since the previous iteration (I have not yet read the whole thing again, which I will later). Thanks.