From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:39:18 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] Makefile: correct example fuzz build
Message-ID: <xmqqimypr6yx.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <350ea5f7c97aa4166eea56aa57b66ddc9c53de4a.1547582104.git.steadmon@google.com>

Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
> ---
>  Makefile | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 6b72f37c29..bbcfc2bc9f 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -3104,7 +3104,7 @@ cover_db_html: cover_db
>  # An example command to build against libFuzzer from LLVM 4.0.0:
>  #
>  # make CC=clang CXX=clang++ \
> -#      FUZZ_CXXFLAGS="-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard -fsanitize=address" \
> +#      CFLAGS="-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard -fsanitize=address" \
>  #      LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE=/usr/lib/llvm-4.0/lib/libFuzzer.a \
>  #      fuzz-all
>  #

I know this appeared in v2 of the series, but I cannot quite read
the reasoning/justification behind this change.  After this hunk
there is

    FUZZ_CXXFLAGS ?= $(CFLAGS)

so if you do not give CFLAGS but give FUZZ_CXXFLAGS, like the
sample, shouldn't it have worked just fine?  IOW "correct" in the
title is a bit too terse as an explanation for this change.