From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 17:01:09 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ls-tree: make <tree-ish> optional
Message-ID: <xmqqh8lcmh7u.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BGJjJGhOEBiJJ5J5rnMXfLndKgwU-4_JVqumBB81DUHpQ@mail.gmail.com>

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:

>> I'd prefer *not* to have such a DWIM in a command like ls-tree, aka
>> plumbing commands, where predictability is worth 1000 times more
>> than ease of typing.
>
> Fair enough.  However, what if no <tree-ish> or <path> are specified,
> though -- would you be okay with the HEAD being assumed instead of
> erroring out in that case?

If we wrote ls-tree to do so 12 years ago, then I wouldn't have
opposed.  Changing the behaviour now?  Not so sure if it is worth
having to worry about updating the code, docs and making sure we
spot all the possible typoes.