From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:36:19 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] remote-curl: fix deadlocks when remote server disconnects Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200518165056.GD42240@coredump.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Overall this looks pretty cleanly done. I left a few minor comments > throughout, but the real question is whether we prefer the "0002" packet > in the last one, or if we instead insist that the response end in a > flush. Thanks for a review. I was reading the series through and I found it a reasonably pleasant read. > So I think either of your solutions (enforcing a final flush, or the > 0002 packet) is preferable. I'm on the fence between them. I am undecided, too X-<.