From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 19:00:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] chainlint.pl: fix incorrect CPU count on Linux SPARC
Message-ID: <xmqqh6ep4qoy.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cTfqk+tbTAVyPj8YP1uHx1D1swL84h-4p6OKBV=dDRX_Q@mail.gmail.com>

Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:

>> > > "CPUnn:" in /proc/cpuinfo instead of the usual "processor NN:".
>> >
>> > not sure if worth a reroll, but the "usual" syntax is "processor  : NN"
> ...
> Inclusion of the word "usual" is such a minor flaw in the commit
> message that I doubt it warrants a reroll and the associated cost on
> reviewers and on the maintainer (Junio), especially since it does not
> negatively impact the intent conveyed by the commit messages nor the
> correctness of the actual patch.
>
> As such, I'm not worried about it. Whether Junio reads this and wants
> to correct it in his tree is up to him, of course.

I think "usual" is not what was pointed out. The order between the
colon and NN is.