From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:04:35 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2024, #03; Mon, 4)
Message-ID: <xmqqh68lrzvw.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <20241105212849.3759572-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:

>> * jt/repack-local-promisor (2024-11-03) 5 commits
>> ...
>>  Needs review.
>>  Breaks CI (with a known fix).
>>  source: <cover.1730491845.git.jonathantanmy@google.com>
>
> The fixup (in your tree) looks good.
>
> As for review, for what it's worth, Josh Steadmon has written some
> comments [1], which I've addressed. Regarding the big-picture issue
> as to whether this solution is the best one for the problem we have,
> both Han Young [2] and I have verified (with private repos) that this
> solution does not have noticeable performance issues (which was a
> concern with other solutions) and I think that this solution does well
> to preserve the concept that we know which objects are re-fetchable from
> the remote (even if we have created them locally) and which are not.

Thanks for helping me with what happened on the list while I was
away.