From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 07:47:49 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] alloc: fix dangling pointer in alloc_state cleanup Message-ID: In-Reply-To: "ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget" writes: > +void alloc_state_free_and_null(struct alloc_state **s_) > { > + struct alloc_state *s; > + > + if (!s_ || !*s_) return; I still do not see the point of this check. If the caller passes a NULL pointer, when they are expected to pass the address of a pointer variable so that the struct the pointer points at is cleared and freed, and the pointer variable is NULLed, it is called a programmer error and they deserve a segfault. Why would it be better to sweep such an error under the rug by returning without anything? It would delay discovery of such a bug, but for what gain?