From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:04:58 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-patch: use repository instance from add_i_state instead of the_repository Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260317165230.628705-1-shreyanshpaliwalcmsmn@gmail.com> Shreyansh Paliwal writes: >> > Functions parse_diff(), edit_hunk_manually() and patch_update_file() use >> > the_repository even though a repository instance is already available via >> > struct add_i_state s which is defined in struct add_p_state *s. >> > >> > Use 's->s.r' instead of the_repository to avoid relying on global state. All >> > callers pass a valid add_p_state and this does not change any behavior. >> > >> > This aligns with the ongoing effort to reduce usage of the_repository global >> > state. >> >> So we can call this "reduce" but cannot say "eliminate" yet, as the >> files uses comment_line_str? >> >> The header lists some global variables inside >> "#ifndef USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE/#endif" block, and the >> comment-line stuff is among them. >> > > Yes that's right, there is an instance of comment_line_str, should I add this > in the commit message and send a reroll ? No need to. I was just wondering if there are something I missed.