From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:44:22 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] log: properly handle decorations with chained tags Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20131219031809.GG259467@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> "brian m. carlson" writes: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:36:06PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I think all we need to do, in addition to what the existing code >> does, is to make sure that we _parse_ the object that the tag points >> at, to avoid this problem. Something like this, perhaps, instead? > > Yeah, that's the clean fix I was looking for, but couldn't quite come up > with. I'm going to re-roll with your fix instead of mine and my tests. > Any objections to adding your sign-off? I was actually planning to just squash 35a34ce281 as a fixup! to your 5e65a201 and call it a day. I think your proposed log message in the latter clearly describes why the fix is correct.