From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:50:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] headers: include dependent headers
Message-ID: <xmqqfvg2ngrn.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <540B7AA3.1090201@web.de>

René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:

> Am 06.09.2014 um 21:20 schrieb David Aguilar:
>> Add dependent headers so that including a header does not
>> require including additional headers.
>>
>> This makes it so that "gcc -c $header" succeeds for each header.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
>> diff --git a/branch.h b/branch.h
>> index 64173ab..a61fd1a 100644
>> --- a/branch.h
>> +++ b/branch.h
>> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
>>
>>   /* Functions for acting on the information about branches. */
>>
>> +#include "cache.h"
>> +#include "strbuf.h"
>
> cache.h includes strbuf.h, so the line above isn't necessary.

True, but is "gcc -c $header" something we want to please in the
first place (not an objection, but request for opinions)?