From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:55:10 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix verify_lock() to report errors via strbuf Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5565B1AE.3010708@alum.mit.edu> Michael Haggerty writes: > The last sentence is nonsense. This patch series relies on > lock_ref_sha1_basic() having a "strbuf *err" parameter, which is only > the case since > > 4a32b2e lock_ref_sha1_basic(): report errors via a "struct strbuf > *err" (2015-05-11) > > The latter commit is in mh/ref-directory-file (which has now been merged > to master, so technically the last sentence is now correct again). [5/5] seems to conflict with the write_ref_sha1() vs write_ref_to_lockfile() updates; I think I can manage, though ;-)