From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:42:12 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] trace: cosmetic fixes for error messages Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160803230022.drw4kcwgheeqn3xr@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > I think it would be nicer to still to print: > > warning: first line > warning: second line > > etc. We do that for "advice:", but not the rest of the vreportf > functions. It might be nice to do that, but we'd have to go back to > printing into a buffer (since we can't break up the incoming format > string that we feed to fprintf). Yes, yes.