From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:36:20 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sha1_file: open window into packfiles with O_CLOEXEC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Linus Torvalds writes: > But the basic issue still remains - I'd really prefer to have NOATIME > stay around for all those poor misguided souls that for some reason > don't like "relatime" or run old kernels. But whether it is with > O_NOATIME at open time or with F_SETFL, I don't care. Understood. Would the best endgame shape for this function be to open with O_NOATIME (and retry without), and then add CLOEXEC with fcntl(2) but ignoring an error from it, I guess? That would be the closest to what we historically had, I would think.