From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 17:44:46 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pull, fetch: fix segfault in --set-upstream option Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87h7f5we6q.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: >> If we all agree that die() is a better action, that must be done >> now, or it will become never once the change is released to the >> field. > > Because someone might have been relying on the current behavior of > segfaulting to stop their script? And a mere warning() would break > things for them by having the script "work" if this patch were to make > it into a release? No, because someone WILL start rely on the warning() behaviour, expecting that the "fixed" command will now run to completion without exiting with non-zero status. Once that happens, it will become impossible to flip it to die().