From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:17:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/14] Makefile: wire up the clar unit testing framework
Message-ID: <xmqqfrq8r8s8.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <9c74c5ae01989659c0347d2742f820d2161d274b.1725459142.git.ps@pks.im>

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> +UNIT_TESTS_PROG = $(UNIT_TEST_BIN)/unit-tests$(X)
> +UNIT_TESTS_OBJS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o,$(UNIT_TESTS_SUITES))
> +UNIT_TESTS_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/clar/clar.o
> +UNIT_TESTS_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/unit-test.o
> +
>  UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-ctype
>  UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-example-decorate
>  UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-hash
> @@ -2714,6 +2721,7 @@ OBJECTS += $(XDIFF_OBJS)
>  OBJECTS += $(FUZZ_OBJS)
>  OBJECTS += $(REFTABLE_OBJS) $(REFTABLE_TEST_OBJS)
>  OBJECTS += $(UNIT_TEST_OBJS)
> +OBJECTS += $(UNIT_TESTS_OBJS)

What is the longer term direction we envision?  Do we aim to retire
the UNIT_TEST_* and end up with only the clar based tests?

At least until that happens, can we have "UNIT_TESTS" -> "CLAR_TEST"
or something that makes it less confusing?  Every time I see merge
conflicts around this area in the Makefile, I get puzzled and wonder
which one is which.

Thanks.