From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 23:21:32 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] trailer: prepare to expose functions as part of API
Message-ID: <xmqqedcuc0w3.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <owlyttlq529h.fsf@fine.c.googlers.com>

Linus Arver <linusa@google.com> writes:

>> Nit: this patch and the next one will become commits, so perhaps:
>>
>> s/In the next patch/In a following commit/
>
> TBH I've always wondered whether "patch" or "commit" matters --- I've
> seen examples of patch series that referred to "commits" instead of
> "patches", and vice versa. I was hoping to hear an opinion on this, so
> I'm happy to see (and apply) your suggestion. Thanks.

I think it is just fine to use either; sticking to one you pick
consistently in the same series would have value.  If you prefer
commit, then fine.  If you like patch, that's fine too.