From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 01:46:57 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] win32: pthread_cond_init should return a value Message-ID: In-Reply-To: "AZero13 via GitGitGadget" writes: > From: Greg Funni > > This value is not checked, but it must return to match POSIX > > Signed-off-by: Greg Funni > --- > win32: pthread_cond_init should return a value > > This value is not checked, but it must return to match POSIX > ... > -#define pthread_cond_init(a,b) InitializeConditionVariable((a)) > +#define pthread_cond_init(a,b) return_0((InitializeConditionVariable((a)), 0)) This is tricky and I like it. Because InitializeConditionVariable() returns void, and return_0() is defined as such: static inline int return_0(int i) { return 0; } you cannot directly pass InitializeConditionVariable() to it, so you use a comma operator and pass 0 to return_0(). Because the type of the comma operator with mixed operands is the type of the rightmost operand, the type of "InitializeConditionVariable((a)), 0" is type of "0", so return_0() would happily take it as an int, and returns 0. This should work correctly, but it still is tricky and yucky. You may not have to use return_0(), but OK. Will queue. Thanks.