From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:11:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing
Message-ID: <xmqqczafopc0.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <86699708-d631-fb49-482c-af27204a3570@dunelm.org.uk>

Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:

>>> Both of these will be fixed in a future series that
>>> stops the sequencer calling setenv().
>> If it gets fixed in a future step in the same series, that is a
>> different matter, but if it is easy enough not to deliberately
>> introduce a new leak, we'd prefer to do so.
>
> It's a couple of patches to fix which are more or less finished, I'm
> planning to send them once this series is in next.

So we will do the "add a known breakage of the same kind as there
exists others, and then later fix them all up, including the one
that is added by this series, because fixes are non-trivial and this
topic is easier to finish if we allowed to add a known breakage"
approach?  Just making sure it is what you plan to do.

Thanks.