From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:18:42 GMT Subject: Re: implement a stable 'Last updated' in Documentation Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20150128080214.GA18851@aepfle.de> Olaf Hering writes: > On Tue, Jan 27, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > What file timestamp should be used for them? Likely "../version"? >> >> I tend to think the "Last updated" timestamp taken from the >> filesystem timestamp is a bad practice inherited by these tools from >> the days back when nobody used any revision control systems. > > I'm not sure. The bug is that such 'Last updated' line exists at all in > the default output. Noone asked for it, noone really needs it. And it > makes it impossible to get reproducible builds. Amen to that ;-)