From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:06:18 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] unpack-trees: fix accidentally quadratic behavior Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1453409984.16226.46.camel@twopensource.com> David Turner writes: >> The first break is correct, but I am not sure about the "else if" >> part. Shouldn't it be doing something similar to the logic to "keep >> looking" that talks about "t-i", "t" and "t/a" at the end of the >> loop? > > Rather than doing more complicated logic, let's just do the first > check; it seems about as fast for our repo, and I think will usually be > so. does that seem reasonable to you? Very reasonable. I was mostly afraid of leaving the loop prematurely and giving a wrong answer to the caller.