From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 16:19:40 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] rev-parse: documentation adjustment - mention remote tracking with @{u} Message-ID: In-Reply-To: "Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget" writes: > '[]@\{upstream\}', e.g. 'master@\{upstream\}', '@\{u\}':: > The suffix '@\{upstream\}' to a branchname (short form '@\{u\}') > - refers to the branch that the branch specified by branchname is set to build on > - top of (configured with `branch..remote` and > - `branch..merge`). A missing branchname defaults to the > - current one. These suffixes are also accepted when spelled in uppercase, and > - they mean the same thing no matter the case. > + refers to the remote branch that the branch specified by branchname > + is set to build on top of (configured with `branch..remote` and > + `branch..merge`). Let's refrain from inventing confusing new phrases that are not defined in "git help glossary". What is a "remote branch"? I think this is better left as "the branch", to avoid confusion with remote-tracking branch we keep locally. I think a version with a slight tweak, e.g. ... refers to the name of the branch (configured with `branch..merge`) at the remote (configured with `branch..remote`) that the branch is set to build on top of. would be OK, though. > ... As `branch..merge` is the branch path on the > + remote, it is first converted to a local tracking branch (i.e., something in > + `refs/remotes/`). Let's correct it to "remote-tracking branch". But more importantly, the order of explanation feels a bit backwards. Something like... A branch B may be set up to build on top of a branch X (configured with `branch..merge`) at a remote R (configured with `branch..remote`). B@{u} refers to the remote-tracking branch for the branch X taken from remote R, typically found at `refs/remotes/R/X`. ... to cover both of the above, perhaps, may flow more naturally? > ... A missing branchname defaults to the current one. These > + suffixes are also accepted when spelled in uppercase, and they mean the same > + thing no matter the case. > '[]@\{push\}', e.g. 'master@\{push\}', '@\{push\}':: > The suffix '@\{push}' reports the branch "where we would push to" if > `git push` were run while `branchname` was checked out (or the current > - `HEAD` if no branchname is specified). Since our push destination is > - in a remote repository, of course, we report the local tracking branch > - that corresponds to that branch (i.e., something in `refs/remotes/`). > + `HEAD` if no branchname is specified). Like for '@\{upstream\}', we report > + the local tracking branch that corresponds to that remote branch. > + > Here's an example to make it more clear: > + > > base-commit: 5b71c59bc3b9365075e2a175aa7b6f2b0c84ce44