From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:34:01 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] ref-transactions-reflog Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20141120032453.GH6527@google.com> Jonathan Nieder writes: > I also have some thoughts about how those operations can be > implemented without such a performance hit (reading the whole > reflog into memory as part of the transaction seems problematic to > me), but that should probably wait for a separate message (and > I've talked about it a bit in person). Perhaps iterator interface such as for_each_reflog_ent() would help?