From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:42:49 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] apply: refuse touching a file beyond symlink Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20150130181153.GA25513@peff.net> Jeff King writes: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:45:22PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> + if (!patch->is_delete && path_is_beyond_symlink(patch->new_name)) >> + return error(_("affected file '%s' is beyond a symbolic link"), >> + patch->new_name); > > Why does this not kick in when deleting a file? Half-written logic, forgotten to be revisited (i.e. "ok, anything that is not delete we can check new_name, so do that first, later we'd deal with deletion patch and I think the way to do so is by checking old_name, but let's make sure this case works first"). Thanks for catching.