From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:52:20 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] checkout: added two options to control progress output Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20151029220519.GA466@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: >> --progress-lf: print progress information using LFs instead of CRs > > I notice this is part of your patch 1, but it really seems orthogonal to > checkout's --progress option. It should probably be a separate patch, > and it probably needs some justification in the commit message (i.e., > explain not just _what_ you are doing in the patch, but _why_ it is > useful). Yes, and as I doubted its validity, I would really have preferred to see it done as a later step. The "we want to say --[no-]progress" one on the other hand looked a very sensible change, and it was sad to see it taken hostage by that -lf thing. Thanks.