From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 03:00:53 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] tag: Implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano writes: > I haven't looked at the patch text of this one closely yet, but I > think the goals of both make sense, so we would eventually want to > have them both. > ... > So perhaps you would want this applied first, so that existing three > can already benefit from "implicit --list" before waiting for the > other one? Ah, I see that you already have the other topic polished to v4 (sorry, but I am a bit behind the list traffic). If it makes your life easier, it is OK to make the current three to four by adding "--no-contains" first and then make all/any of them imply "--list" on top. IOW, either is fine. Personally, I have a suspicion that sending both at the same time, expecting the maintainer to be able to resolve the potential conflicts correctly, would also be fine ;-) Thanks.