From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:53:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/known-leaky: add list of known-leaky test scripts
Message-ID: <xmqqa7w21dz7.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN0heSoDJdA3tTVZZ=imj8+z5FeqKy00dA2kWP4CAC4=+7VBiw@mail.gmail.com>

Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> writes:

> On 19 February 2018 at 22:29, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> ...
>> Or alternatively, we could just not bother with checking this into the
>> repository, and it becomes a local thing for people interested in
>> leak-testing. What's the value in having a shared known-leaky list,
>> especially if we don't expect most people to run it.
>
> This sums up my feeling about this.

Even though keeping track of list of known-leaky tests may not be so
interesting, we can still salvage useful pieces from the discussion
and make them available to developers, e.g.  something like

    prove --dry --state=failed |
    perl -lne '/^(t[0-9]{4})-.*\.sh$/ and print $1' | sort >$@+
    if cmp >/dev/null $@ $@+; then rm $@+; else mv $@+ $@; fi

could be made into a target to stash away the list of failing tests
after a test run?