From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:29:27 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mingw: avoid relative `#include`s Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Johannes Sixt writes: > Why is this needed? ;-) As pointed out by Matthias, the changes in the posted patch are not complete/comprehensive. > With #include "foo" it is quite clear that the file is first looked up > from the directory of the file being processed. The changed code > requires that the top-level directory is among the -I directives of the > command lines. Then it would be much more logical to use #include > instead. I actually prefer that, but that is a taste thing I do not want to impose on this project. > So, IMO, the status quo is perfect and does not need this change. I tend to agree, but it would be a waste of time to further discuss on this. As long as it does not break compilation, I'll just let the patch graduate. My preference is to * always name custom headers using the path from the top-level (we use -I in BASIC_CFLAGS exactly for this purpose), e.g. #include "compat/win32.h" (good) #include "win32.h" (not good) * compat header that aims to replace system supplied headers like should use -I appropriately and appear as if they are from the system, e.g. #include (good) #include "compat/regex/regex.h" (not good) If somebody truly wants to improve things once the dust settles from these patches, I would appreciate they keep the above in mind. THanks.