From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 21:05:48 GMT Subject: Re: pathspec: match and original in pathspec_item are const Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <15ABB1A3-AAA6-4F53-B46C-C92E0B529520@ytausch.de> Yannik Tausch writes: >> The 'const' patch will be queued separately, and a synthetic base will >> be prepared for your two-patch series by merging the 'const' patch on >> a recent tip of master. >> >> Unless you have other changes, there is no need for you to send a >> three-patch series. We do not need to take the 'const' patch hostage >> to the 'pathspec' patch. > > Okay, anything I need to do now since I already submitted this as v3? If [v3 2/3] and [v3 3/3] are identical to v2, just telling me to ignore v3 would be sufficient. If you need to make further changes, a two-patch series v4 on top of d66ac2af30 (Merge branch 'jc/pathspec-match-const' into yt/pathspec-negative-prefix, 2026-09-03) would be great. Thanks.