From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:29:58 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] sequencer: preserve commit messages Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54EC98BD.7060100@drmicha.warpmail.net> Michael J Gruber writes: >> Hmm, wouldn't it introduce a grave regression for users who >> explicitly ask to clean crufty messages up (by setting their own >> commit.cleanup configuration) if you unconditionally force >> "--cleanup=verbatim" here? >> > > That's what I meant by possible side-effects below. > ... > But git cherry-pick without conflict should no re-cleanup the commit > message either, should it? Hmm, but if it does not, wouldn't that countermand the wish of the user who explicitly asked to clean crufty messages up by setting their own commit.cleanup configuration?