From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 02:58:02 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] completion.commands: fix multiple command removals
Message-ID: <xmqq8sx9szlx.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190320180329.22280-1-tmz@pobox.com>

Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> writes:

> Other than a follow-up to update the commit reference in 4/4
> after 1/4 is in the final form on pu, I think this might be good.
> If it's easier, we can skip 4/4 and I'll resend it after the
> others are on pu.

A series that makes a single topic should expect to be read by a
reader who understand the context of individual pieces in the topic,
so it is more common to refer to an earlier step of a series from a
later step without the object name.  I would have written the log
message like so instead:

    completion: use __git when calling --list-cmds

    As we made --list-cmds read the local configuration file in an
    earlier step, the completion.commands variable respects repo-level
    configuration.  Use __git which ensures that the proper repo config
    is consulted if the command line contains 'git -C /some/other/repo'.

The whole series looks good to me.  Thanks for working on it.