From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 17:38:48 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] start_command: reset disposition of all signals in child Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <376d3ea0-a3eb-4b25-8bf2-ca40c4699e26@gmail.com> Phillip Wood writes: > Oh I should have looked more carefully at the existing uses. It looks > like it is only my sequencer patch that does > > sigchain_push(SIGINT, SIG_IGN); > sigchain_push(SIGQUIT, SIG_IGN); > res = run_command(...); Hmph, does it mean this patch would become unnecessary, once you fix the above sequence to follow the pattern "to spawn and then ignore"?